<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s saga against Breastfeeding photos&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michelle.ivany.org/2009/01/05/facebooks-saga-against-breastfeeding-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michelle.ivany.org/2009/01/05/facebooks-saga-against-breastfeeding-photos/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Appalled</title>
		<link>http://michelle.ivany.org/2009/01/05/facebooks-saga-against-breastfeeding-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Appalled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.ivany.org/?p=38#comment-364</guid>
		<description>I want to know why Poor Emma would get punished numerous times and she was just being herself and trying to educate people.  She didn't spam photos or make a fool of herself trying to play games with Facebook regarding nude photos.  Yet there is a woman on the Facebook petition page who plays games with Facebook and various breastfeeding pages, and she openly admits to it and brags constantly, by reposting her nude photos.  She could care less about her baby in the photos, she just wants to rile people up.

It's totally unfair because she gets no punishment, just photos removed that she quickly uploads within the hour of removal.

If poor Emma gets her page banned for only a few photos while she tried to educae people, than this joker of a woman messing with Facebook and other people should be punished too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know why Poor Emma would get punished numerous times and she was just being herself and trying to educate people.  She didn&#8217;t spam photos or make a fool of herself trying to play games with Facebook regarding nude photos.  Yet there is a woman on the Facebook petition page who plays games with Facebook and various breastfeeding pages, and she openly admits to it and brags constantly, by reposting her nude photos.  She could care less about her baby in the photos, she just wants to rile people up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s totally unfair because she gets no punishment, just photos removed that she quickly uploads within the hour of removal.</p>
<p>If poor Emma gets her page banned for only a few photos while she tried to educae people, than this joker of a woman messing with Facebook and other people should be punished too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 step forward, 2 steps back &#124; PhD in Parenting</title>
		<link>http://michelle.ivany.org/2009/01/05/facebooks-saga-against-breastfeeding-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>1 step forward, 2 steps back &#124; PhD in Parenting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.ivany.org/?p=38#comment-343</guid>
		<description>[...] person to have had her facebook account completely disabled for posting breastfeeding pictures (read her public letter and plea to facebook here). This is particularly relevant because facebook has said that no major newspaper in North America [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] person to have had her facebook account completely disabled for posting breastfeeding pictures (read her public letter and plea to facebook here). This is particularly relevant because facebook has said that no major newspaper in North America [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wooly Bully: Watch it Now, Watch It! &#171; Barely Knit Together</title>
		<link>http://michelle.ivany.org/2009/01/05/facebooks-saga-against-breastfeeding-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Wooly Bully: Watch it Now, Watch It! &#171; Barely Knit Together</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.ivany.org/?p=38#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...] *Emma Kwasnica (whose name I became familiar with from the wool soaker group) was photographed tandem nursing her two wee ones, and Facebook subsequently deleted her account, ostensibly because of those photos.  The whole story and a letter from her can be read here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *Emma Kwasnica (whose name I became familiar with from the wool soaker group) was photographed tandem nursing her two wee ones, and Facebook subsequently deleted her account, ostensibly because of those photos.  The whole story and a letter from her can be read here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 step forward, 2 steps back &#171; PhD in Parenting Blog</title>
		<link>http://michelle.ivany.org/2009/01/05/facebooks-saga-against-breastfeeding-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>1 step forward, 2 steps back &#171; PhD in Parenting Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michelle.ivany.org/?p=38#comment-336</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, she is the first person to have had her facebook account completely disabled over this issue (read her public letter and plea to facebook here). This is particularly relevant because facebook has said that no major newspaper in North America [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, she is the first person to have had her facebook account completely disabled over this issue (read her public letter and plea to facebook here). This is particularly relevant because facebook has said that no major newspaper in North America [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

